Is your pump delivering the flow you need — or consuming more energy than it should?
Explore how pipe size, flow demand, system head, pump efficiency and motor choice connect. Change one assumption; see what happens to energy demand and operating cost.
01 · Explore the system
Conceptual system schematic, not a LiDAR scan or pump manufacturer performance curve.
02 · Change the assumptions
Fluid defaults: water at approximately 20°C (density 998 kg/m³; dynamic viscosity 0.001 Pa·s). Assumes steady, incompressible, single-phase flow and fixed efficiencies.
03 · See connected consequences
Energy cost uses an illustrative rate in unspecified monetary units per kWh, not a currency forecast. Calculated head includes static lift and simplified Darcy–Weisbach friction and fittings losses. Motor nameplate comparison is not a motor selection recommendation.
What would make this an engineering-grade experience?
Connect the captured piping geometry to verified inside diameters, materials, elevations, valves and fittings; then add manufacturer pump curves, efficiency maps, NPSH available/required, fluid characteristics, duty cycles, VFD control, starting torque, service factor, electrical supply and applicable safety margins. A system curve intersecting a real pump curve is essential before claiming a pump can deliver a duty point. The evolving connected model may support future Digital Twin capabilities where appropriate.